Floral morphology and anatomy of Fagus grandifolia subsp. mexicana (Fagaceae), an endangered-relict tree of the Mexican montane cloud forest

keywords: catkins, dichasia, inflorecence, mass flowering, Mexican beech, palynology


Background: This study is the first to examine the inflorescence, and the staminate and pistillate flowers of the Mexican beech, an endangered-relict tropical montane cloud tree species.

Questions: Are there morphological and anatomical differences in Mexican beech's inflorescence and flowers in comparison with other beech species worldwide?

Study species: Fagus grandifolia subsp. mexicana (Martínez) A.E. Murray)

Study site and dates: Five Mexican beech stands from eastern Mexico, early February to early March 2017 and 2020.

Methods: 400 Mexican beech floral buds and immature pistillate and staminate flowers in anthesis were collected and processed by light microscopy analysis and the pollen by scanning electron microscopy.

Results: We found floral morphology and anatomy differences of this southernmost American beech species regarding the New- and Old-World taxa. We found that the inflorescence morphology of the Mexican beech is similar to some Asian beeches such as F. hayatae subsp. pashanica, F. lucida and F. longipetiolata. Notwithstanding, the staminate and pistillate flowers' anatomy is similar to that of F. grandifolia from Canada and the United States of America, F. sylvatica from Europe and F. crenata from Japan.

Conclusions: The inflorescence and floral anatomical and morphological differences can be explained by possible hybridizations. Since only the pistillate and staminate flowers of F. sylvatica and F. grandifolia have been studied in detail, morphological, molecular and ecological studies of the Asian beech species are needed to achieve a better understanding of the floral morphology and anatomical evolution of these species and their relationship with the Mexican beech.


Download data is not yet available.
Floral morphology and anatomy of <em>Fagus grandifolia</em> subsp. <em>mexicana</em> (Fagaceae), an endangered-relict tree of the Mexican montane cloud forest


Abbe EC. 1974. Flowers and inflorescences of the "Amentijeme". The Botanical Review 40: 169-26l. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859135

Abe T, Tachiki Y, Kon H, Nagasaka A, Onodera K, Minamino K, Han Q, Satake A. 2016. Parameterisation and validation of a resource budget model for masting using spatiotemporal flowering data of individual trees. Ecology Letters 19: 1129-1139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12651

Berridge EM. 1914. The structure of the flower of Fagaceae, and its bearing on the affinities of the group. Annals of Botany 28: 509-526.

Biaggi RE. 1978. Palynology and Paleoecology of some Oligo-Miocene sediments from Chiapas, Mexico. MS. Thesis. Walla Walla College, California USA.

Brett DW. 1964. The inflorescence of Fagus and Castanea, and the evolution of the cupules of the Fagaceae. New Phytologist 63: 96-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1964.tb07363.x

Cole LW. 1923. Teratological phenomena in the inflorescences of Fagus sylvatica. Annals of Botany 37: 147-150.

Denk T. 2003. Phylogeny of Fagus L. (Fagaceae) based on morphological data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 240: 55-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-003-0018-x

Denk T, Grimm GW. 2009. The biogeographic history of beech trees. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 158: 83-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2009.08.007

Denk T, Grimm GW, Hemleben V. 2005. Patterns of molecular and morphological differentiation in Fagus (Fagaceae): phylogenetic implications. American Journal of Botany 92: 1006-1016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.6.1006

Denk T, Grimm GW, Manos PS, Deng M, Hipp AL. 2017. An updated infrageneric classification of the oaks: review of previous taxonomic schemes and synthesis of evolutionary patterns. In: Gil-Pelegrín E, Peguero-Pina J, Sancho-Knapik D. eds, Oaks Physiological Ecology. Exploring the Functional Diversity of Genus Quercus L., Tree Physiology 7. Switzerland Springer. pp. 13-38. ISBB 1568-2544 ISBN 978-3-319-69099-5; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69099-5_2

Denk Y, Meller B. 2001. Systematic significance of the cupule/nut complex in living and fossil Fagus. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 869-897. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/320768

Denk T, Tekleva MV. 2014. Pollen morphology and ultrastructure of Quercus with focus on Group Ilex (=Quercus Subgenus Heterobalanus (Oerst.) Menitsky): implications for oak systematics and evolution. Grana 53: 255-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00173134.2014.918647

Ehnis DE. 1981. Fagus mexicana Martínez: su ecología e importancia. BSc. Thesis Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Eichler A. 1878. Bluthendiagramme, vol. 2. Leipzig.

Fang J, Lechowicz MJ. 2006. Climatic limits for the present distribution of beech (Fagus L.) species in the world. Journal of Biogeography 33: 1804-1819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01533.x

Fey B, Endress PK. 1983. Development and morphological interpretation of the cupule in Fagaceae. Flora 173: 451-468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0367-2530(17)32023-6

Forman LL. 1966. On the evolution of cupules in the Fagaceae. Kew Bulletin 18: 385-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4115792

Gandolfo MA, Nixon KC, Crepet WL, Grimaldi DA. 2018. A late Cretaceous fagalean inflorescence preserved in amber from New Jersey. American Journal of Botany 105: 1424-1435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1103

Garrison HJ. 1957. Floral morphology and ontogeny of Fagus grandifolia Ehrh. PhD Thesis. Pennsylvania State University.

Gerrits PO, Smid L. 1983. A new, less toxic polymerization system for the embedding of soft tissues in glycol methacrylate and subsequent preparing of serial sections. Journal of Microscopy 132: 81-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1983.tb04711.x

Godínez-Ibarra O, Ángeles-Pérez G, López-Mata L, García-Moya E, Valdez-Hernández JI, Santos-Posadas HD, Trinidad-Santos A. 2007. Lluvia de semillas y emergencia de plántulas de Fagus grandifolia subsp. mexicana en La Mojonera, Hidalgo, México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 78: 117-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2007.001.394

González-Espinosa M, Meave JA, Lorea-Hernández FG, Ibarra-Manríquez G, Newton AC. 2011. The Red List of Mexican Cloud Forest Trees. United Kingdom: Fauna & Flora International. Cambridge. ISBN: 9781903703281

Gortemaker RE. 1986. A method to identify pollen of some recent and fossil species of Fagus L. (Fagaceae). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 47: 263-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-6667(86)90040-0

Herendeen PS, Crane PR, Drinnan AN. 1995. Fagaceous flowers, fruits, and cupules from the Campanian (Late Cretaceous) of central Georgia, USA. International Journal of Plant Sciences 156: 93-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/297231

Hjelmqvist H. 1948. Studies on the floral morphology and phylogeny of the Amentiferae. Botaniska Notiser 2: 11-171.

Johansen DA. 1940. Plant Microtechnique. London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Kaul RB, Abbe EC. 1984. Inflorescence architecture and evolution in the Fagaceae. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 65: 375-401.

Kitamura K, Kawano S. 2001. Regional differentiation in genetic components for the American beech, Fagus grandifolia Ehrh., in relation to geological history and mode of reproduction. Journal of Plant Research 114: 353-368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00013997

Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F. 2006. World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 15: 259-263.

Langdon LM. 1939. Ontogenetic and anatomical studies of the flower and fruit of the Fagaceae and Juglandaceae. Botanical Gazette 101: 302-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/334872

Little EL. 1965. Mexican beech, a variety of Fagus grandifolia. Castanea 30: 167-170.

López CL. 2005. Técnicas para el Estudio del Desarrollo de Angiospermas. Mexico City: Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, ISBN: 9786070282522

Macdonald AD. 1979. Inception of the cupule of Quercus macrocarpa and Fagus grandifolia. Canadian Journal of Botany 57: 1777-1782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/b79-220

Manchester SR, Dillhoff RM. 2004. Fagus (Fagaceae) fruits, foliage, and pollen from the Middle Eocene of Pacific northwestern North America. Canadian Journal of Botany 82: 1509-1517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/b04-112

Manos PS, Stanford M. 2001. The historical biogeography of Fagaceae: tracking the Tertiary history of temperate and subtropical forests of the Northern Hemisphere. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162 (6, Supplement): S77-S93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/323280

Manos PS, Zhou Z-K, Cannon CH. 2001. Systematics of Fagaceae: phylogenetic tests of reproductive trait evolution. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 1361-1379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/322949

Manos PS, Cannon CH, Oh S-H. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships and taxonomic status of the paleoendemic Fagaceae of western North America: recognition of a new genus, Notholithocarpus. Madroño 55: 181-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3120/0024-9637-55.3.181

Martínez M. 1940. Una nueva especie forestal (Fagus mexicana sp. nov). Anales del Instituto de Biología11: 85-89.

Nixon KC, Jensen RJ, Manos PS, Muller CH. 1997. Fagaceae. Flora of North America North of Mexico. New York and Oxford: Flora of North America Editorial Committee. ISBN: 978-0195112467

Okamoto M. 1989. New interpretation of the inflorescence of Fagus drawn from the developmental study of Fagus crenata, with description of an extremely monstrous cupule. American Journal of Botany 76: 14-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1989.tb11279.x

Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA. 2007. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 4: 439-473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007

Peters R. 1992. Ecology of beech forests in the northern Hemisphere. PhD Thesis. Wageningen Agricultural University.

Peters R. 1995. Architecture and development of Mexican beech forest. Vegetation science in forestry. In: Box EO, Peet RK, Masuzawa T, Yamada I, Fujiwara K, Maycock PF, eds. Vegetation Science in Forestry, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 325-343.

Peters R. 1997. Beech Forests. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN: 978-90-481-4824-0

Renner SS, Grimm GW, Kapli P, Denk T. 2016. Species relationships and divergence times in beeches: new insights from the inclusion of 53 young and old fossils in a birth-death clock model. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371: 2015.0135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0135

Reitsma Tj. 1970. Suggestions towards unification of descriptive terminology of angiosperm pollen grains. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 10: 39-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-6667(70)90021-7

Rodríguez-Ramírez EC, Sánchez-González A, Ángeles-Pérez G. 2016. Relationship between vegetation structure and microenvironment in Fagus grandifolia subsp. mexicana forest relicts in Mexico. Journal of Plant Ecology 138: 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtw138

SEMARNAT [Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales]. 2010. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010, Protección ambiental – Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres – Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio – Lista de especies en riesgo. Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2da Sección, 30 de diciembre de 2010.

Thaowetsuwan P, Honorio-Coronado EN, Ronse De Craene LP. 2017. Floral morphology and anatomy of Ophiocaryon, a paedomorphic genus of Sabiaceae. Annals of Botany 120: 819-832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcx115

Van Campo M, Elhai H. 1956. Etude comparative des pollens de quelques chênes. Application à une tourbière normande. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France 103: 254-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00378941.1956.10837774

Williams-Linera G, Devall S, Álvarez-Aquino C. 2000. A relict population of Fagus grandifolia var. mexicana at the Acatlán Volcano, Mexico: structure, litterfall, phenology and dendroecology. Journal of Biogeography 27: 1297-1309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00500.x

Williams-Linera G, Rowden A, Newton AC. 2003. Distribution and stand characteristics of relict populations of Mexican beech (Fagus grandifolia var. mexicana). Biological Conservation 109: 27-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00129-5

How to Cite
Rodríguez-Ramírez, E. C., Andrés-Hernández, A. R., & Luna-Vega, I. (2021). Floral morphology and anatomy of Fagus grandifolia subsp. mexicana (Fagaceae), an endangered-relict tree of the Mexican montane cloud forest. Botanical Sciences, 99(3), 599-610. https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.2818